Sarvadharm Samabhav Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Kendra Bk Through Secretary v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:18372-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11985 OF 2018 Sarvadharm Sambhav Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Kendra (Bk.), Tq. Sengaon, Dist. Hingoli, Through its Secretary Shri. Bhimrao Laxman Bhagat ..

Review Applicant (Petitioner in W.P.)

Versus

1.

The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai- 400 032 And others ..

Respondents Mr. A. S. Barlota, Advocate for Review-Applicant; Mr. V. M. Kagne, A.G.P. for Respondents/State ...

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4202 OF 2022 IN RAST/24034/2021 IN WP/11985/2028 ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATED : 14-08-2024 PER COURT :- 1.

We have heard the learned Advocate for the ReviewApplicant/Petitioner and the learned A.G.P. on behalf of respondents/State.

2.

In the Order dated 09.08.2021, which is sought to be reviewed, we find that, inadvertently the word "report" of Respondent No.3 dated 21.03.2018, is typed, instead of the words "impugned order" of Respondent No.3. As such, the said correction will have to be carried out in the last sentence in paragraph No. (2), in the fourth sentence in paragraph No. (4), the first sentence in paragraph No. (6) and in the second sentence in paragraph No. (7). The corrected order be uploaded. 3.

Our attention is drawn to the grounds (I) to (IV), set out in the memo of the Review Petition.

4.

In the light of the grounds put-forth by the ReviewApplicant/Petitioner, we called upon the learned A.G.P. for the State as to whether recognition of the said School operated by the Petitioner, has been restored, after it was withdrawn by the impugned order dated 21.03.2018. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits, on instructions, that recognition has never been restored ever since. The Minister has also not interfered in the Appeal preferred by the Petitioner and the recognition has not been restored.

5.

In view of the above, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record.

6.

This Review Application is dismissed.

7.

In view of the above, the pending Civil Application No.4202 of 2022 would not survive and stands disposed off.

( S. G. MEHARE ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) JUDGE JUDGE rrd