← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8492/2020delay condonatedrejected

The Administrator Cidco, Aurangabad v. Fulchand Laxman Salampure And ANR

2021-10-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni2 pages

1 925 CA-8492-20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CA/8492/2020 IN FAST/22830/2020 The Administrator CIDCO, CIDCO Office, Jalna Road, Aurangabad ...Applicant

VERSUS

Fulchand S/o Laxman Salampure, Died through LR's

...Respondents

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Anil S. Bajaj Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1-A to 1-E : Mr. Swapnil Joshi for J.P.Legal Associates AGP for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. A.M.Phule ...

CORAM :

SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.

DATE :

26-10-2021 PER COURT :

01.

It is an application for condonation of delay moved by the applicant.

02.

Heard Mr. Bajaj, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for contesting respondents.

03.

It is revealed that there is delay of 216 days in preferring the appeal. The applicant seeks condonation

2 925 CA-8492-20 of delay. The applicant has assigned reasons in this application in para No. 2. Taking into consideration the reasons assigned for condonation of delay in para No. 2, it is necessary to allow this application.

ORDER

I) The application for condonation of delay is hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). II) The registry is directed to scrutinize the appeal as per procedure and it be numbered and then it be listed for admission.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI] JUDGE Dahibhate/-