Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Depot Controller v. Kalyan Asaram Tour
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13570 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 22486 OF 2022 Divisional Controller, MSRTC Applicant
Versus
Kalyan Asaram Tour & others Respondents Mr. A. B. Dhongade, advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. S. Shinde, advocate holding for Mr. P. B. Vikhe, advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 06th December, 2022.
PC :
Advocate Mr. P. B. Vikhe causes appearance on behalf of Respondents No.1 & 2-original claimants, through learned Counsel Mr. S. S. Shinde.
Heard rival submissions.
The learned Counsel for the appellant-MSRTC pointed out that Respondent No.3 is the driver of MSRTC and therefore, is a formal party. The appellant-applicant MSRTC is seeking condonation of delay of only 13 days. There is no strong oppose from other side. As such, delay of 13 days
{2} stands condoned.
The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.
Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb
{3}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13571 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 22486 OF 2022 Divisional Controller, MSRTC Applicant
Versus
Kalyan Asaram Tour & others Respondents Mr. A. B. Dhongade, advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. S. Shinde, advocate holding for Mr. P. B. Vikhe, advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 06th December, 2022.
PC :
Since the appellant-MSRTC has deposited entire amount of compensation, the application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause "B"and disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb