Supriya Madhav Nilawad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 902-WP-9699-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9699 OF 2018 Supriya D/o Madhav Nilawad

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. V.S. Panpatte, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. A.R. Kale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.1 Mr. P.R. Nangare, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 15th MARCH, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

The learned Counsel submits that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the proposal for approval to the appointment of the petitioner is rejected. As such, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the orders passed. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. No costs. [ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE mta