Damodar Laxman Pattekar v. The State Of Maharshtra And ORS
WP 7471/11 - 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7471 Of 2011 Damodar s/o Laxman Pattekar Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr. P.S. Patil, AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No. 6. CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ & R.G. AVACHAT, J.
DATE: 25.09.2019 PER COURT :
1] Vide impugned order dated 28.02.2011 the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Aurangabad, denied relief to the petitioner on account of he having less than five years of residual service left and thus was not considered for promotion. Petition succeeded to the limited extent of promotion of Respondent No. 6 being quashed.
WP 7471/11 - 2 - 2] Respondent No. 6 filed Writ Petition No. 3312/2011 which was allowed vide order dated 04.10.2011. Thus, as regards Respondent No. 6, the issue stands closed but as regards the petitioner he superannuated and as of today and the question of issuing any direction to consider him for promotion does not arise.
3] The petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(R.G. AVACHAT, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE dyb