Sayyed Irfan Sayyed Burhan v. Suraiya W/O. Sayyed Irfan And Another

2855.22APPLN.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 57 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2855 OF 2022 IN REVNST/7804/2022 WITH APPLN/2856/2022 IN REVNST/7804/2022 SAYYED IRFAN SAYYED BURHAN

VERSUS

SURAIYA W/O. SAYYED IRFAN AND ANOTHER ...

Mr.K.K. Pathan, advocate for applicant.

Mr.A.S. Usmanpurkar, advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2.

...

CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 05, 2022 PER COURT :- .

Heard the respective counsel.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the reasons assigned for the delay were beyond the control of the applicant. There was no deliberate delay in filing the application. However, the learned counsel for the respondents oppose the application contending that the reasons assigned for the delay are not reasonable.

3.

Perused the application. The Court is satisfied that there was no inordinate delay in preferring the revision. The reasons are sound. Hence the delay is condoned.

4.

The application is allowed in the above terms.

2855.22APPLN.odt 5.

Registry is directed to register the Criminal Revision.

6.

The respondents are granted liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the applicant in view of the orders of this Court.

7.

Interim relief to continue till next date.

8.

Stand over to 16th January, 2023.

(S.G. MEHARE, J.) SGA