← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8578/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Manchak Sheshrao Ban v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-08-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde3 pages

1 wp8574 and ors.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8574 OF 2016 KANKHR SAWAIRAM JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8575 OF 2016 SHANKAR KALURAM BHARSHANKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8576 OF 2016 SAMBHAJI SADASHIVRAO WADEWALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8577 OF 2016 MADHAV HANAVATI CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8578 OF 2016 MANCHAK SHESHRAO BAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2 wp8574 and ors.odt AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8579 OF 2016 VIJAY TRIMBAKRAO POKALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS -- Mr.A.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner in all petitions Mrs.A.V.Deshmukh, AGP for respondent no.1 -- CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 11, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard.

2.

In view of the remedy of Appeal available under Rule 14 of the Discipline and Appeal Rules, before the Addl. Commissioner (Revenue), we decline to entertain these petitions directed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3.

In the circumstances, we dispose of these petitions with liberty to the petitioners to avail the said remedy, in case the petitioners are so advised.

3 wp8574 and ors.odt 4.

All contentions of the petitioners are left open to be agitated before the said authority.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] kbp