Shireen Naz Shaikh Mohd Sayeed v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 W.P. No. 9458/2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 95.

WRIT PETITION NO. 9458 of 2018 Smt. Shireen Naz Shaikh Mohd. Sayeed

...Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra and others

...Respondents

Mr. V.G. Salgare, Advocate for petitioner Mr. P.S. Patil, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respts. No. 1 & 2 Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for respondent No.3 Mr. P.P. Kothari, Advocate for respondent No. 5 C ORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATE : 9th December, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

The learned Addl. Govt. Pleader submits that respondent No.2- the Director of Education (Primary), M.S. Pune-1 has informed respondent No.4-the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, to process the claim of the petitioner for appointment as 'Shikshan Sevak' without insisting for marks-memo and by verifying other documents. Alongwith the letter, the annexure states that the petitioner has secured 113 marks.

2 W.P. No. 9458/2018 2.

The Chief Executive Officer and respondent No.5 - the Education Officer (Primary), Z.P., Ahmednagar, shall consider the communication of the Director of Education (Primary) dated 8th November 2019 and shall process the claim of the petitioner for the appointment, on its own merits, considering that she has obtained 113 marks, as communicated by the Director OF Education (Primary). The respondents No. 4 and 5 can verify the other documents while considering the appointment of the petitioner. The decision shall be taken expeditiously and preferably, within a period of one month.

3.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. ( AVINASH G. GHAROTE ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE Madkar