← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10324/2021delay condonatedrejected

Sheshrao Jaising Sevatre v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Jalna And Others

2022-10-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10293 OF 2021 IN FAST/24176/2021 DNYANDEV SANTOSH SEVATRE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

AND 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10297 OF 2021 IN FAST/24218/2021 ANANDA GOVINDA SHEVTRE (DIED) THR LRS. SUKHDEO ANANDA SEVATRE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

AND 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10298 OF 2021 IN FAST/24180/2021 DEVIDAS MAHADEV SEVATRE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

AND 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10320 OF 2021 IN FAST/24227/2021 AVCHITRAO DHONDIBA SEVATRE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

AND

908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10324 OF 2021 IN FAST/24231/2021 WITH CA/10325/2021 IN FAST/24229/2021 SHESHRAO JAISING SEVATRE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rajesh Mewara h/f. Mr. Bhise Vitthal Dnyanoba AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. P. N. Kutti, Mr. A.A. Jagatkar, Mr. S. R.

Yadav - Lonikar Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. S. B. Deshpande ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 06.10.2022 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants in all these applications are seeking condonation of delay periods as mentioned in the applications. The delay appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned AGP as well as learned counsel for Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications that delay is not properly explained.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants the aforesaid delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid periods of delay.

3.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

Applications are disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-