Aditya Anil Salunke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

88-WP-9113-2020.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 88 WRIT PETITION NO.9113 OF 2020 ADITYA ANIL SALUNKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Yeramwar Sushant C. AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. S. K. Tambe Advocate for Respondent No.3: Mr. V. S. Kadam ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 1st March, 2021 P.C. :

.

The learned counsel submits that after filing of writ petition, the claim has been invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee and submits that the petitioner has already challenged the invalidation by separate petition and nothing remains in the present petition for adjudication.

2.

In light of that, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) Sameer