Kedar Ravindra Salunke v. Manikchand Chandulal Borana

criap4418.15, etc.

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4418 OF 2015 Sau. Parvati Amit Salunke ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Manikchand Chandulal Borana ..RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4420 OF 2015 Sou. Anar Ravindra Salunke ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Manikchand Chandulal Borana ..RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.4422 OF 2015 Kedar Ravindra Salunke ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Manikchand Chandulal Borana ..RESPONDENT Mr S.J. Salunke, Advocate for applicant;

Mr S.R. Choukidar, Advocate for respondent CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 26th September, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

After hearing the respective Counsel, it is required to be observed that prima facie, findings recorded in paragraphs 25 and 26 are contrary to the view expressed by the Division Bench of this Court at principal seat, in the matter of Dinesh Chokshi & ors. vs. Rahul Vasudeo Bhatt & anr., reported in 2013 STPL (DC) 654 Bom.

criap4418.15, etc.

(2) 2.

In view thereof, leave granted.

3.

Admit.

4.

Mr Choukidar, learned Counsel waives service of notice on behalf of respondent.

5.

Action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) amj