← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10388/2021disposed off

Sangita Shankar Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2021-09-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha2 pages

1 wp 10385.2021+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 WRIT PETITION NO.10385 OF 2021 PADMA SHIVAJI MANDAGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Khedkar Avinash S. AGP for Respondent No. 1: Mrs. M. A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondents No.2&3: Mr. Avinash Aghav ...

AND ...

934 WRIT PETITION NO.10388 OF 2021 SANGITA SHANKAR KAMBLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Khedkar Avinash S. AGP for Respondent No. 1: Mr. S. G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. Avinash Aghav ...

AND ...

939 WRIT PETITION NO.10393 OF 2021 ANITA PUNDLIK TATHE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Khedkar Avinash S. AGP for Respondent No. 1: Mr. K. N. Lokhande Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. Avinash Aghav ...

AND ...

942 WRIT PETITION NO.10396 OF 2021 KANTILAL RAJARAM DHAWALE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Khedkar Avinash S. AGP for Respondents No. 1&2: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya Advocate for Respondent No. 3: Mr. Avinash Aghav ...

2 wp 10385.2021+ CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE: 21st SEPTEMBER, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

Mr. Khedkar, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed applications seeking benefit of couple convenience.

2.

The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent no. 1 in Writ Petition Nos. 10385 of 2021, 10388 of 2021, 10393 of 2021 and for respondents no. 1 & 2 in Writ Petition No. 10396 of 2021. Mr. Aghav, learned Advocate appears for respondents no. 2 and 3 in respective petitions and submits that respondent no. 2 / 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar in respective petitions would decide the representations of the petitioners on it's own merits, in accordance with law and policy, preferably within a period of eight (08) weeks. 3.

In view of the said statement, writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe