← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/811/2024disposed off

Marathwada Mahatma Phule Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its President v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2025-04-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,Hon'Ble Justice Smt. Manjusha Ajay Deshpande2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:12995-DB Sr. Nos.939, 940, 945 & 946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CONT. PETITION NO. 842 OF 2024 IN WP/3788/2023 MATAJI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BHAGWANRAO BABARAO INGEWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vinod B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Kalpalata Bharaswadkar, Addl. G. P. for Respondents-State. ...

WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 811 OF 2024 IN WP/3544/2023 MARATHWADA MAHATMA PHULE SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vinod B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Kalpalata Bharaswadkar, Addl. G. P. for Respondents-State. ...

AND 940 CONT. PETITION NO. 843 OF 2024 IN WP/3784/2023 SHRIKRUSHNA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BALAJI DEVIDAS PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vinod B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Uma Bhosale, AGP for Respondents-State.

...

AND 945 CONT. PETITION NO. 991 OF 2024 IN WP/3525/2023 Tauseef

Sr. Nos.939, 940, 945 & 946 APPROPRIATE RURAL TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE ANAND NAGAR TQ AND DISTRICT NANDED

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vinod B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Uma Bhosale, AGP for Respondents-State.

...

AND 946 CONT. PETITION NO. 992 OF 2024 IN WP/3798/2023 JAGDISH SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL DABDARI TQ HIMAYATNAGAR DISTRICT NANDED

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Vinod B. Jadhav, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Uma Bhosale, AGP for Respondents-State.

...

CORAM :

NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ DATE :

29th APRIL, 2025 P.C.:- 1.

Learned Additional Government Pleader on instructions from Respondent No.3 makes a statement that decision in the case of Petitioner will be taken within two weeks from today. Statement of learned Additional Government Pleader is recorded as undertaking to this Court. By recording the said undertaking, contempt petitions are disposed of.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Tauseef