Waman Kesuba Late, L.Rs. Dnyanoba And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

CA12740.2013.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12740 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL ST NO. 24664 OF 2013 Mahadeo Kisanrao Late Applicant..

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents..

........

Mr P. R. Kadam, Advocate for the applicant Mr Deshmukh, AGP for respondent/State Mr Survase, Advocate for respondent No. 3 ..........

ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12805 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL ST NO. 24667 OF 2013 CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 23RD OCTOBER, 2015.

PER COURT:

.

Mr Survase, learned Counsel for non-applicant No. 3 opposes the applications on the ground that no sufficient cause is stated. 2.

The averments made in the applications are not controverted by non-applicants by filing affidavit. The applicants have also shown bona fide by filing an undertaking to the effect that they

CA12740.2013.odt would not claim statutory benefits for the delayed period. 3.

In light of that, the applications are allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Applications stand disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] sgp