← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9666/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Sandeep Yadnesh Manilal Patil v. Roshani Arpita Sandeep Patil

2019-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages

wp9666-17 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9666 OF 2017 Sandeep @ Yadnesh Manilal Patil PETITIONER

VERSUS

Roshani @ Arpita Sandeep Patil RESPONDENT .......

Mr. Vinod Y. Bhide, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vinod Patil, Advocate for the respondent .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 26 th FEBRUARY, 2019 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the respondent states that the respondent does not have any particular objection if the writ petition is allowed in terms of compromise.

2.

In view of the same writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE drp/wp9666-17