Bombay High CourtWP/9666/2017disposed offdismissed for default
Sandeep Yadnesh Manilal Patil v. Roshani Arpita Sandeep Patil
2019-02-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh1 pages
wp9666-17 drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9666 OF 2017 Sandeep @ Yadnesh Manilal Patil PETITIONER
VERSUS
Roshani @ Arpita Sandeep Patil RESPONDENT .......
Mr. Vinod Y. Bhide, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vinod Patil, Advocate for the respondent .......
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 26 th FEBRUARY, 2019 ORDER :
1.
Learned advocate for the respondent states that the respondent does not have any particular objection if the writ petition is allowed in terms of compromise.
2.
In view of the same writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE drp/wp9666-17