Sudinayana Goraknath Shejul v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Aurangabad And Others
1 910 to 917 ca 12490-21+
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12490 OF 2021 IN FAST/30211/2021 KISAN PANDURANG JADHAV (DIED) THR LRS PUSHPABAI AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS AND 911 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12491 OF 2021 IN FAST/30218/2021 VINAYAK PANDURANG JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS AND 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12492 OF 2021 IN FAST/30215/2021 BABASAHEB PANDURANG JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS AND 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12493 OF 2021 IN FAST/26805/2021 BHASKAR BHAURAO KADAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE S.L.A.O. JAYAKWADI
2 910 to 917 ca 12490-21+ PROJECT - I AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12494 OF 2021 IN FAST/25653/2021 RAJENDRA SANTU BHAVSAR AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND ORS AND 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12495 OF 2021 IN FAST/24340/2021 WITH CA/12496/2021 IN FAST/24345/2021 SUDINAYANA GORAKNATH SHEJUL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS AND 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12497 OF 2021 IN FAST/26790/2021 KARBHARI BHANUDAS SAWADE
VERSUS
THE S.L.A.O. JAYAKWADI PROJECT - I AURANGABAD AND ANR AND 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12498 OF 2021 IN FAST/27126/2021 WITH CA/12499/2021 IN FAST/27129/2021 SOMINATH RANGNATH JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR,
3 910 to 917 ca 12490-21+ AURANGABAD AND ANR ....
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED : 18/04/2023.
P. C. :
1.
Heard rival submissions.
2.
The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appears to be caused due to their poor fnancial condition.
3.
The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods. The acquiring body though served, but remained absent.
4.
However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.
5.
The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.
6.
The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-