The State Of Mah And ORS v. Sudhakar Narsing Kadam

{1} ca13055-09 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13055 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.24919 OF 2009 The State of Maharashtra APPLICANT

VERSUS

Baban Narsing Kadam RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13057 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.24942 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13053 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.24892 OF 2009 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13051 OF 2009 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.24946 OF 2009 .......

Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for the applicant - State Mr. V. T. Sakolkar, Advocate for respondents - claimants .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 10 th APRIL, 2018 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

2.

Learned AGP refers to the contents of the applications and submits that delay has been caused under the circumstances

{2} ca13055-09 referred to therein. He submits that the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate, nor any benefit has been derived by causing the delay.

3.

Learned advocate for the respondent - claimants purports to resist the applications, however, is not in a position to challenge veracity of the contents of the applications. 4.

In the circumstances, having regard to the reasons as are given in the applications, the delay is condoned, applications are allowed and are disposed of.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca13055-09