Bharatbhushan Sonajirao Kshirsagar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

CA 11661/16 in WP 9597/15 & another - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11661/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9597/2015 Bharatbhushan Sonajirao Kshirsagar.

...Applicant..

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another.

...Respondents...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11662/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9598/2015 Rajesh Hanumant Kshirsagar & others.

...Applicants..

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another.

...Respondents...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= .....

Shri G.K. Naik Thigale, Advocate for applicants. Shri M.B. Bharaswadkar, AGP for respondent no.1. Shri S.H. Joshi, Advocate for respondent no.2. .....

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE: 24.08.2016 ORDER :

1] These two civil applications seek leave to amend the memo of the writ petitions and include the challenge to

CA 11661/16 in WP 9597/15 & another - 2 - the validity of Section 10 of the Indian Telegraph Act. 2] We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3] The writ petitions are not yet admitted. Even otherwise, the respondents will have every right to controvert the pleadings sought to be made by way of amendment by filing their reply.

4] Considering the above, the civil applications seeking leave to amend are allowed and disposed of. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

(K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ndk/c2481616.doc