Dhanu Digambar Mungse v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through S.L.A.O., Special Branch, Aurangabad And ANR

(1) 974 CA-12932.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 974 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12932 OF 2022 IN FAST/22768/2022 DHANU DIGAMBAR MUNGSE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH S.L.A.O., SPECIAL BRANCH, AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. S.B. Joshi (for J.P. Legal Associates), Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. B.V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ramraje Deshmukh, Advocate holding for Mr. Shambhuraje Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

3rd January 2023.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard rival submissions. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 125 days in filing the appeal which appears to be caused due to his financial crisis. The learned A.G.P. as well as learned Counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the application on the ground that delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 125 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period.

2.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections.

3.

The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde