← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9043/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Sundar Rangnath Pawar Died Lrs Narmada Sundar Pawar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Osmanabad And ORS

2025-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:23923 973 CA 9039 25+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 973 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9039 OF 2025 IN FAST/11299/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9040 OF 2025 IN FAST/11302/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9041 OF 2025 IN FAST/11292/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9043 OF 2025 IN FAST/11295/2025 POPAT JANARDHAN PAWAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Jadhav h/f Mr. More Abhijit S. AGP for Respondent nos 1 & 3: Mr. N.D. Raje Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. G.B. Rajale ...

976 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9170 OF 2025 IN FAST/10079/2024 NIVRATTI JIJABA JADHAV DIED THROUGH HIS LRS DADA NIVRATTI JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AT OSMANABAD AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav Jadhav h/f Mr. More Abhijit S. AGP for Respondent nos 1 & 3: Mr. N.D. Raje Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. G.B. Rajale ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 04.09.2025 PER COURT :

Heard both sides.

1/2

973 CA 9039 25+.odt 2.

The applicants are seeking withdrawal of amount of Rs. 1,34,036/- (in CA No. 9039/2025), Rs. 17,40,899/- ( in CA No. 9040/2025), Rs. 6,12,644/- ( In CA No. 9041/2025), Rs. 9,70,276/- ( in CA No. 9043/2025), and Rs. 33,57,287/- ( in CA No. 5603/2024), in respective appeals. The learned counsel for the applicants tenders on record a common order dated 25.07.2025, and prays for disbursement of the amount on the ground of parity.

3.

The learned counsel for the respondent-acquiring body fairly concedes that identical course can be adopted for disbursement of the amount, as the present appeals are also from the same project and acquisition. 4.

In view of the order dated 25.07.2025 passed in similarly situated matters, I partly allowed the applications by permitting the applicants to receive 50% of the amount with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking and further 25% of the amount with accrued interest on furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. Balance amount shall be invested in any nationalized bank. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 2/2