Deelip Dnyanoba Makane v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10442 OF 2017 IN FAST/25191/2017 WITH CA/10443/2017 IN FAST/26184/2017 WITH CA/10444/2017 IN FAST/26180/2017 WITH CA/10445/2017 IN FAST/26178/2017 WITH CA/10446/2017 IN FAST/26182/2017 WITH CA/10447/2017 IN FAST/26176/2017 DEELIP DNYANOBA MAKANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sontakke Gajanan K And Mrs Pg Sontakke (Patil) AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. R.B.Bagul Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr. A.M.Gaikwad and Mr. A.P.Yenegure .....

CORAM : SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 O R D E R :

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the respondents.

Till today, enhanced compensation amount is not deposited by respondent no.3 acquiring body. Therefore, the reason assigned by the applicant for not filing appeal within time due to financial crises is acceptable.

Delay of 1392 days is condoned.

ca10442.17 Applicant/appellant to file written undertaking in First Appeal that he/they will waive interest and statutory benefits for the period of delay.

Civil Application is disposed.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. A.M.Gaikwad and Mr. A.P.Yenegure, learned counsel waive service of notice for respondent no.3 in the appeals in which they appear for respondent no.3.

Call for R. and P.

[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] dbm