Kishan Rangrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Latur And Others

1 955 ca 5753-22+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 955 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5753 OF 2022 IN FAST/24984/2021 WITH CA/5752/2022 IN FAST/24539/2021 WITH CA/5755/2022 IN FAST/24986/2021 WITH CA/5754/2022 IN FAST/24988/2021 WITH CA/5756/2022 IN FAST/24990/2021 RAVINDRA VASANT WALSANGE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE COLLECTOR, LATUR ANDORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dhanure Bramhanand M. AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 3: Mr. S. R. Yadav Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. C. Arora ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 23/08/2022.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 2270 days, which appears inordinate in nature. However, the applicants appear poor persons and therefore, considering their statutory right and for the reasons stated in the applications, the delay of 2270 days stands condoned, subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed. 3.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-