Sakharam Gangadhar Dalvi v. Shriram Satishbhau Somani And ANR

2025:BHC-AUG:9688 945-CA-2404-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2404 OF 2023 IN FAST/23248/2020 SAKHARAM GANGADHAR DALVI

VERSUS

SHRIRAM SATISHBHAU SOMANI AND ANR ...

Mr. Pravin N. Kalani, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. R. R. Kale h/for Mr. R. J. Nirmal, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

DATE : 28.03.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

This is an Application for condonation of 416 days delay in preferring the Appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 25th June 2019 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Parbhani in M.A.C.P. No.168 of 2014, by which the Applicant's/Claimant's Petition came to be dismissed. 2.

On this Application notice was issued by order dated 20h June 2023. The learned Advocate Mr. Kale and Mr. Deshmukh appears for Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2-Insurance Company.

(( 2 )) 945-CA-2404-23 3.

It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the Applicant that sufficient reasons are shown in the Application which prevented him to file the Appeal within the stipulated time. He submits that the Application be allowed.

4.

The Application is opposed by the learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

5.

On going through the Application and reasons mentioned therein, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. [ NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] HRJadhav