← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9040/2015disposed offdismissed for default

National Education Society Through Its Vice President Shaikh Saleem Aashaq Hussain v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-07-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.L. Wadane4 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.110 OF 2014 Dagadu Sardar Barde Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate with Mr.A.B.Kale, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.111 OF 2014 Ramesh Dhansingh Karghe Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate with Mr.A.B.Kale, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.112 OF 2014 Nanda Samadhan Salve Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate with Mr.A.B.Kale, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.M.C.Swamy, advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4.

{2} PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.43 OF 2015 Narayan Arjun Lahane & others Petitioners Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate with Mr.A.B.Kale, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. WRIT PETITION NO.9039 OF 2015 National Education Society, Sillod Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. WRIT PETITION NO.9040 OF 2015 National Education Society, Sillod Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.Y.Mahajan, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. WRIT PETITION NO.9041 OF 2015 National Education Society, Sillod

{3} Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.Y.Mahajan, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. WRIT PETITION NO.9042 OF 2015 National Education Society, Sillod Mr.A.S.Bayas, advocate advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.Y.Mahajan, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.L.WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 01st July, 2016 PER COURT:

It is recorded in the affidavit-in-reply presented on behalf of the State, that the State Government, is taking every step to see that the proposals are finalised at the earliest but due to heavy workload and looking to number of proposals that have received requires time up to 30.05.2016 to take decision on the proposals of opening new Secondary Schools in the State of Maharashtra. The affidavit was presented on 01.10.2015. Learned Counsel appearing for petitioners state that the State has not yet taken any decision.

{4} In this view of the matter, all these petitions stand disposed of with a direction to the State Government to take appropriate decision in the matter in accordance with provisions of law and in consonance with policy prescribed by the State Government, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from today.

K.L.WADANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/pil11014