Mukesh Haribhau Chandane. v. The State Of Maharashtra.

1 Cr.Apln. 4443.2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4443 OF 2016 MUKESH HARIBHAU CHANDANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .............................

Mr. S.J.Salunke, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. S.J.Salgare, A.P.P. for Resp. - State.

..............................

CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J.

DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2016 .............................

PER COURT :

1.

The applicant/accused in Crime No. 204/2016 registered at Beed (City) police station, Beed, Dist. Beed for the offences punishable u/ss 394,450,451 of the Indian Penal Code, by this application is praying for releasing him on bail. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. He argued that necessary investigation qua present applicant is over. The applicant is just 19 years of age and he is not having any criminal antecedents.

3.

The learned A.P.P. opposed the application by

2 Cr.Apln. 4443.2016 contending that the applicant was caught red-handed while stealing an amount of Rs. 1020/- from the pocket of pant of the informant.

4.

Perused F.I.R. as well as the record made available. The informant had reported to police that on 29/06/2016 in the afternoon when he was at his house, the applicant entered his house and took out amount of Rs. 1020/- from the pocket of the pant kept at the house. The applicant was caught red-handed.

5.

Be that as it may, now the applicant is in M.C.R. Necessary investigation appears to have been made by the Investigating Officer. The applicant is young person having no criminal antecedents. His further detention in the company of criminals is not warranted and hence, the following order. (i) The application is allowed.

(ii) The applicant Mukesh s/o Haribhau Chandane in Crime No. 204/2016 registered at Beed (City) police station, Beed, Dist. Beed for the offences punishable u/ss 394,450,451 of the Indian Penal Code be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond of Rs. 15,000/- [Rupees Fifteen Thousand] and on furnishing surety in the like amount. (iii) As a condition of this Order, the applicant shall not extend any threat, inducement or promise to the persons acquainted with the facts of the accusation so as to dissuade

3 Cr.Apln. 4443.2016 them from disclosing the same either to the police or the Court.

(iv) The applicant shall not tamper the evidence of the prosecution.

[A.M.BADAR, J.] KNP/Cr.Apln. 4443.2016