Ashok Jagannath Latpate v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 922-wp-8223-2020.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8223 OF 2020 Ashok Jagannath Latpate ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. M. S. Karad, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S. P. Tiwari, AGP for the State ....

CORAM :S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATED : 15th DECEMBER, 2020 PER COURT :- .

We have heard Mr. Karad, the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 2.

The learned AGP refers to the order dated 26th November, 2020 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai in Original Application No.653 of 2020 with other connected original applications.

3.

The order cancelling the validity of sports certificates of power lifting issued by the Deputy Director, Pune/Aurangabad in

2 922-wp-8223-2020.doc October 2020 is withdrawn. The same is pursuant to the statement made by the learned Chief Presenting Officer on instructions. Para No.12 of the order of the Tribunal reads thus: "12. Thus we dispose off all the applications with following order:

(a) The respondents shall withdraw their respective orders on or before 4.12.2020. The respondents are free to give show cause notice to all the applicants or other similarly situated government servants. However, the notice should include the reasons of the cancellation of validity to enable the applicants to meet the objections effectively. If such orders are issued, personal hearing to be given to all such similarly situated persons thereafter within 3 weeks.

(b) In the event of any order of cancellation of the validity of the sports certificate is passed, thereafter for one week no further order of termination is to be passed from the date of the service of the order.

(c) The applicants and similarly situated persons are hereby directed to appear before the respondent authority as and when date and time is given along with the documents, if any, and co-operate the authority."

3 922-wp-8223-2020.doc 4.

The learned AGP submits that the same would apply to the petitioner also.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, i.e. the petitioner is also protected vide order dated 26th November, 2020 passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal at Mumbai in Original Application No.653 of 2020 with other connected original application, the present writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. [ SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE SMS