Mallinath Kant Madiwale And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1014.22WP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 WRIT PETITION NO.1014 OF 2022 MALLINATH KANT MADIWALE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr.A.G. Ambetkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent/State.

...

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S.G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 27th JANUARY, 2022 PER COURT :- .

We have heard Mr. Ambetkar, learned advocate for the petitioners.

2.

Prayers made in the present matter were subject matter of consideration in Writ Petition No.12238/2017 and Writ Petition No.7106/2013 decided by this Court under orders dated 21.10.2020 and 09.05.2014.

3.

Some of the petitioners therein have already filed Contempt Petition for the said orders not being implemented.

4.

For the same purpose, the separate Writ Petition would not also be tenable.

5.

In the light of that we dispose of the Writ Petition. The petitioners, who are similarly

1014.22WP.odt situated persons, are entitled to prosecute the contempt petition and may prosecute it.

6.

Needless to observe that we have not considered the contentions of the petitioners on merits and all the contentions are kept open. (S.G.DIGE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) SGA