Shantanu Vijay Joshi v. Yogini @ Neha Shantanu Joshi And ANR

{1} fca61-19 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.61 OF 2019 Shantanu Vijay Joshi APPELLANT

VERSUS

Yogini @ Neha w/o Shantanu Joshi Yogini @ Neha d/o Vijay Sangmule and Another RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Pradeep N. Sonpethkar, Advocate for respondents .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.] DATE :

8 th OCTOBER, 2020 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocates for the parties state that the parties to the appeal have settled all their disputes in terms of written down compromise. Learned advocates further refer to that the terms of compromise have been read and understood by the parties which have been recorded according to their instructions and directions and they have solemnly accepted contents of the same. It is further specifically referred to that interest of the minor has been taken care of.

2.

Learned advocates state that the parties are present before the court and they have identified their respective clients

{2} fca61-19 and that the parties have signed the deed of compromise in their presence before Registrar (Judicial) and the Registrar has duly verified the compromise deed. It is submitted that none of the terms of the compromise is opposed to any public policy nor are they forbidden by any law.

3.

Mr. Sonpethkar, learned advocate for the respondents, states that a certificate, as required under law that the compromise deed is in the interest of and for the benefit of the minor has been issued by him.

4.

Having regard to aforesaid, family court appeal is disposed of in term of compromise as tendered.

[R. G. AVACHAT] [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE JUDGE drp/fca61-19