Kunal Vinaykumar Thirani v. Amol Shripalbhai Sheth And Others

496.2017CP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.496 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.726 OF 2017 Kunal s/o.Vinaykumar Thirani PETITIONER

VERSUS

Amol s/o.Shripalbhai Sheth and others RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.Swapnil S.Patunkar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Abhay Ostwal, Advocate holding for Mr.Nilesh Tribhuwan, Advocate for respondents.

...

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & MANGESH S.PATIL,JJ.

DATE : 13.10.2017 ORDER:

1] Pursuant to the notices issued to the respondents, respondents have caused their appearance and demand draft is handed over to the petitioner.

2] Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is no any further grievance.

496.2017CP.odt 3] The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Suresh Chandra Poddar Vs. Dhani Ram and others1 has taken a view that even where the order of court is complied with, subsequent to receipt of notice of contempt, Court should show judicial grace and magnanimity in dealing with action for contempt.

4] In that view of the matter, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of.

[MANGESH S.PATIL] [S.S.SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC [2002] 1 SCC 766