Pradeep Govindrao Kukale v. The State Of Maharashtra Through District Collector, Latur And ORS

1 955-ca-33-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2020 Pradip Govind Kukale ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents ....

Mr. S. R. Kedar, Advocate for the applicant Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for respondents State ....

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 09th JULY, 2021 PER COURT :- .

Heard.

2.

Learned AGP states that the amount of compensation has been enhanced more than four times. He, therefore, objects for grant of 75% of the withdrawal of the amount. 3.

Perused the impugned award. In the fitness of things, the applicant is permitted to withdraw 65% of the deposited amount. Hence, following order:-

2 955-ca-33-21.doc

O R D E R

(i) The application is partly allowed.

(ii) The applicant is permitted to withdraw 65% of the deposited amount. Out of which, 50% amount is allowed to be withdrawn on furnishing undertaking and balance 15% amount is allowed to be withdrawn on furnishing solvent security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. (iii) Balance 35% amount be kept in any nationalised bank till disposal of the first appeal.

[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] SMS