Mahesh Suresh Dinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

{1} wp867916.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.8679 OF 2016 Pravin s/o Ramdas Malunjkar Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for the petitioner Mr.V.M.Kagane, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.S.Wagh, advocate for Respondent No.3.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8680 OF 2016 Mahesh s/o Suresh Dinde Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.S.Wagh, advocate for Respondent No.3.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8682 OF 2016 Vijay s/o Baban Pande Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & others Respondents Mr.S.T.Shelke, advocate for the petitioner Mr.V.H.Dighe, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.S.Wagh, advocate for Respondent No.3.

{2} wp867916.odt CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 24th October, 2016 PER COURT:

Respondent No.2 has failed to render decision in respect of according approval to the appointment of the petitioners merely on the ground that the proposals, in that regard, have not been submitted during the conduct of camp held during the relevant period. The reason recorded for refusal to consider the proposals is arbitrary and Respondent No.2 - Education Officer is bound to consider the proposals received by him for according approval to the appointment of petitioners.

The adverse decision recorded by Respondent No.2 on 01.06.2016 is quashed and set aside and concerned Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the proposals tendered by the Institution for according approval to the appointment of petitioners on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight weeks from today. Writ Petitions stand disposed of accordingly. K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp867916