Bharti Umesh Bhandarkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 212 OF 2015 IN WP/8303/2013 BHARTI UMESH BHANDARKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. M. N. Nawandar ...

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & V. L. ACHLIYA , JJ.

DATE : 9th January, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

None for the applicant. Mr. Nawandar, the learned counsel for the respondents is present and opposes the application. Writ petition is not admitted. Even otherwise the respondents will be entitled to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of amendment. 2.

It is trite that merits of the amendment are not required to be considered while dealing with the amendment application. Considering the averments made in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C). Amendment to be carried out within 14 days. Civil application disposed of.

(V. L. ACHLIYA, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) JPC 1/1