← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/11601/2023delay condonatedrejected

Pundlik Shripati Dhopare v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Collector, Latur And ORS

2023-12-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

964-CA-11601-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11601 OF 2023 IN FAST/23408/2023 PUNDLIK SHRIPATI DHOPARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. G.K. Sontakke AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Ms. M.L. Sangit ...

CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :07.12.2023 P.C. :

A] ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION FOR DELAY 1] The present Civil Application is filed to condone the delay of 3190 days in filing the First Appeal. 2] Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is poor agriculturists and that his lands are compulsorily acquired. He further submits that applicant would not claim interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period.

3] The learned AGP has strongly opposed the application for condonation of delay.

964-CA-11601-23 4] Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 3190 days in filing the first appeal, subject to condition that the applicant would not be entitled to interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period. Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered.

5) Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. B] ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL 1] The First Appeal is admitted.

2] Call R. & P.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE S.P. Rane