Suvarna Babasaheb Gaikwad v. Vandana Pravin Thokale And ORS

1 12586.2023CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

1 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12586 OF 2023 IN FCAST/23420/2023 SUVARNA BABASAHEB GAIKWAD

VERSUS

VANDANA PRAVIN THOKALE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Sumedha C. Thombare Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. D. R. Markad ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 28, 2023 PER COURT :

.

Learned advocate Mr. D. R. Markad submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of both the respondents, mother and child.

2.

Heard both the sides.

3.

Applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 58 days in preferring an appeal against the order passed by the Family Court in a proceeding under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act. 4.

Considering the nature of the dispute and the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. Register the Family Court Appeal.

2 12586.2023CA.odt 5.

Issue notice to the respondents in the Family Court Appeal. Learned advocate Mr. D. R. Markad waives service for both the respondents even in the appeal.

[NEERAJ P. DHOTE] [MANGESH S. PATIL] JUDGE JUDGE GGP