Maheboob Gulam Rasool v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:31652 25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11170 OF 2014 IN FAST/24254/2014 MAHEBOOB GULAM RASOOL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Charudatta K. Sonawane & Mr. N. R. Thorat. AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. D. J. Patil. ...

CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

17th November, 2025.

P.C.:

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 405 days caused in filing the first appeal.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned on certain conditions. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered.

25.odt It is made clear that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest for the delayed period.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga