Executive Engineer, (Medium Project) Division, Latur And ORS v. Sayyed Habib Sayyed Lal

( 1 ) 951- CA 13509 of 2017 & Ors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 951 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13509 OF 2017 IN FAST/25531/2017 WITH CA/13511/2017 IN FAST/25937/2017 WITH CA/13514/2017 IN FAST/25961/2017 WITH CA/13516/2017 IN FAST/25943/2017 WITH CA/13518/2017 IN FAST/25949/2017 WITH CA/13521/2017 IN FAST/25973/2017 WITH CA/13523/2017 IN FAST/25934/2017 WITH CA/13525/2017 IN FAST/25940/2017 WITH CA/13527/2017 IN FAST/25946/2017 WITH CA/13529/2017 IN FAST/25958/2017 WITH CA/13531/2017 IN FAST/25955/2017 WITH CA/13533/2017 IN FAST/25952/2017 WITH CA/13535/2017 IN FAST/25970/2017 WITH CA/13537/2017 IN FAST/25967/2017 WITH CA/13539/2017 IN FAST/25964/2017 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (MEDIUM PROJECT) DIVISION, LATUR AND ORS.

VERSUS

SAYYED HABIB SAYYED LAL AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.S.G.Sangle h/f.

Mr.Dhongade Suresh D.

Advocate for respective Respondents : Mr.L C Patil ...

CORAM : PRAKASH D.NAIK, J.

DATED :

14.11.2017 PER COURT :- 1) In all these matters, there is delay of 640 days in preferring the First Appeal challenging the Judgment and

( 2 ) 951- CA 13509 of 2017 & Ors.

Order dated 30.7.2015 passed by Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Udgir.

2) Learned counsel Mr.L.C.Patil appears for respective respondents in these applications. He waives service for respective respondents.

3) The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the delay was not intentional and deliberate and in the interest of justice, the delay may be condoned. 4) Learned counsel appearing for the respondents opposes condonation of delay.

5) For the reasons stated in the applications and the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicants, the delay in preferring the appeal challenging the impugned Judgment and Order, is condoned. 6) The applications seeking condonation of delay stand disposed of.

[PRAKASH D.NAIK, J.] SPT/951- CA 13509 of 2017 & Ors.