The Cidco, Cidco Office Aurangabad v. Banubee Sk Kadar And ORS

944-CA-9141-24-CORRECTED.odt CORRECTED ORDER, VIDE SPEAKING TO THE MINUTES ORDER DATED 04th SEPTEMBER, 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9141 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 21881 of 2024 The CIDCO, CIDCO Office, Aurangabad ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Banubee Sk. Kadar and Others ..RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. Nitin Gangal, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. S.V. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant Mr. H.A. Bajaj, Advocate for the respondents Mr. S.D. Ghayal, Addl.G.P. for State ....

CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ DATE : 30th AUGUST, 2024 PER COURT :

1.

This is an application for condonation of 109 days delay in preferring the appeal by the acquiring body against judgment and award passed by the reference Court. There is no dispute that the copy of application and necessary papers have been served on learned counsel for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that sufficient reasons have been given for condonation of delay, and therefore, the application may be allowed.

1 / 2

944-CA-9141-24-CORRECTED.odt 3.

The application is opposed by learned counsel for the respondents. 4.

On going through the application, we allow the application in terms of prayer clause (b).

( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) SSD 2 / 2