Maroti Raghunath Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3259 OF 2018 IN FAST/25669/2017 MAROTI RAGHUNATH SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kale Ajeet B.

AGP for Respondent - State : Mr. A. B. Chate ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 23.01.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 409 days which appears to be caused due to his financial crisis. The learned AGP strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay. The Acquiring Body though served, but remained absent.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicant, the delay of 409 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicant shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly. 3.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

Application is disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE ...

shp/-