Bombay High CourtWP/10825/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Narayan Ramrao Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor3 pages

1 14-WP10819-19+.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14 WRIT PETITION NO. 10819 OF 2019 Sarjerao S/o Shripat Ghodke .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State. 20 WRIT PETITION NO. 10825 OF 2019 Narayan S/o Ramrao Jadhav .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. P. G. Borade, AGP for Respondents-State.

21 WRIT PETITION NO. 10826 OF 2019 Prakash S/o Sandu Kakde .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for Respondents-State. 24 WRIT PETITION NO. 10829 OF 2019 Bhaskar S/o Bhika Arke .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. P. S. Patil, Addl. G. P. for Respondents-State.

2 14-WP10819-19+.doc 34 WRIT PETITION NO. 10841 OF 2019 Bhagwan S/o Namdeo Daud .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S. P Tiwari, AGP for Respondents-State.

35 WRIT PETITION NO. 10842 OF 2019 Baban S/o Kisan Daud Through LRS Jijabai wd/o Baban Daud and Others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioners.

Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondents-State. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATED : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard Mr. More, the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the revenue recovery certificates are issued but the revenue authority are not executing the same.

2.

Hence, we pass the following order :

"I.

In case the revenue recovery certificates in favour of the petitioners are still in force and the properties of respondent No. 4 are

3 14-WP10819-19+.doc not attached or no further steps are taken by any other creditor, then the authorities i.e. respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall execute the revenue recovery certificates in accordance with law expeditiously. The petitioners shall cooperate in showing the properties of the Karkhana movable as well as immovable to enable the authorities to proceed further. We have not laid down any particular time frame, however, it is expected that the authorities shall take expeditious steps to execute the same considering that it is an amount with regard to the gratuity and the petitioners are senior citizens."

3.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

( ANIL S. KILOR ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.