Sunita Yuvraj Pawar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 Sr925WP9761.2018&Anr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 9761 OF 2018 Sunita D/o Yuvraj Pawar Petitioner...

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents...

..........

Mr Vilas S. Panpatte, Advocate for the petitioner Mr G. O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondent/State Mr S. P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondent No. 3 Mr H. S. Bali, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 7 .............

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9723 OF 2018 Vijay S/o. Shivaji Patil Petitioner...

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Respondents...

..........

Mr Vilas S. Panpatte, Advocate for the petitioner Mr G. O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondent/State Mr S. P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for respondent No. 3 Mr H. S. Bali, Advocate for respondents No. 8 to 11 .............

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.

DATE : 06TH OCTOBER, 2018.

PER COURT:- 1.

Leave to correct the date of circular issued by respondent No. 2, is granted.

2 Sr925WP9761.2018&Anr 2.

The petitioners in these two petitions challenge the orders passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Dhule, thereby rejecting the proposals for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioners.

3.

The issue raised in the petitions is now squarely covered by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat delivered in Writ Petition No. 8587 of 2016 and other connected petitions on 10th July, 2017. It is not in dispute that these petitioners are covered under the categories of (b) and (c) carved out by the Division Bench in para 9 of its Judgment (supra). In view of this, the petitions are allowed in terms of prayer clauses (B) and (C) of the petitions.

[ MANISH PITALE ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde