← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10207/2023disposed off

Shri Sant Baludev Majoor Sahakari Sanstha Maraydit Through Its Chairman Subhas Digambar Shelke v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others

2023-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade2 pages

46,50,65-WP-10207-2023+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 46 WRIT PETITION NO.10207 OF 2023 SHRI SANT BALUDEV MAJOOR SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARAYDIT THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SUBHAS DIGAMBAR SHELKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 50 WRIT PETITION NO.10287 OF 2023 JAYDATTA MAJOOR SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN VASANT VITTAL BANDAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 65 WRIT PETITION NO.10325 OF 2023 SHRI SANT BALUDEV MAJOOR SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARAYDIT THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SUBHAS DIGAMBAR SHELKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ....

Mr. Shrimant Mundhe, Advocate for Petitioners Mr. P. S. Patil, Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGPs for Respondent - State ....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE:21.08.2023

(( 2 )) 46,50,65-WP-10207-2023+ PER COURT :- 1.

All these petitioners are entities who claim to have deployed their employees under the EGS for the construction of a public road. The amounts of outstanding bills are set out in prayer clause (C) in each of these petitions. All of them have tendered their representations dated 24.05.2023 and 05.07.2023 seeking clearance of the bills. These representations are pending with Respondent No.3. 2.

We would normally not issue directions for clearance of bills since this amounts to recovery orders.

3.

Therefore, all these petitions are disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider the representations of the petitioners and carry out a verification exercise. If there are certain amounts which are not disputed, the same may be paid to these petitioners within a period of ninety (90) days. If any amounts are disputed, these petitioners shall be informed in writing by Respondent No.3 and they would be at liberty to avail of the recovery proceedings for recovering the disputed amounts.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] SMS