Anant Bappaji Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

10886,18ca (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10886 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1532 OF 2017 Anant s/o Bappaji Kulkarni, Age: Major, Occ: Nil, R/o. Sailu, Tq. Sailu, Dist. Parbhani.

..APPLICANT

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & ors ..RESPONDENTS Mr Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for applicant; Mrs A.V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2;

Mr S.S. Rathi, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.

DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2018 ORAL ORDER :

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the applicant, learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.3.

10886,18ca (2) 2.

The submission of applicant is, though the petitioner has placed on record certain documents to show the concern of the petitioner with the land, some documents remained to be placed on record. It is submission that by placing these documents on record which are the orders passed by the competent authorities, the petitioner is only furthering his case and no prejudice is going to cause to the respondents.

3.

In view of the submission of learned Counsel for the applicant/petitioner and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

4.

Necessary amendment be carried out within one week from today.

( MANGESH S. PATIL ) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE Tupe