Abdullah Badar Badam v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 wp 2563.2022+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 984 WRIT PETITION NO.2563 OF 2022 ABDULLAH BADAR BADAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Murkute J. M.

AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P. N. Kutti ...

AND ...

985 WRIT PETITION NO.2564 OF 2022 DINESH NAMDEO MISAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Murkute J. M.

AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P. N. Kutti ...

AND ...

986 WRIT PETITION NO.2565 OF 2022 SHARAD CHANDRABHAN LOKHANDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Murkute J. M.

AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P. N. Kutti ...

AND ...

987 WRIT PETITION NO.2566 OF 2022 RADHABAI MANGILAL PARCHA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Murkute J. M.

AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. P. N. Kutti ...

2 wp 2563.2022+ CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE: 22nd FEBRUARY, 2022 PER COURT:

1.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners have given applications / representations to the Chief Executive Officer of the Municipal Council, Jalna seeking benefit of Lad-Page Committee Report and appointment on heirship basis. The said applications / representations are pending for more than three years, no decision has been taken. 2.

In case, the Petitioners have filed applications / representations with Respondent No.2 and the same are pending then, Respondent No.2 may take decision upon the said applications / representations on it's own merits, in accordance with law and policy, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months from the date of communication of the present order.

3.

The Writ Petitions accordingly stand disposed of. No costs.

[S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe