Ms Karishma Constructions Through Its Proprietor Pradipkumar Borole v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

- 1 - wp10149.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 37 WRIT PETITION NO. 10149 OF 2024 M/s Karishma Constructions ....Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others .....Respondents Mr. Y. B. Bolkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, AGP for the State.

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.

DATE : 18 SEPTEMBER 2024.

PER COURT :

Having expressed that Petitioner cannot invoke Writ jurisdiction for seeking relief which is in the realm of contract as is prayed for, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition to approach the appropriate forum. 2.

We make it clear that we have not looked into the merits of the controversy neither our order should be considered as a starting point of limitation, if the claim is time barred.

- 2 - wp10149.24.odt 3.

Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) ( NITIN JAMDAR ) JUDGE JUDGE dyb