← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9833/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Hardeendayal Revaji Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

1 914-WP9833-19+.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 WRIT PETITION NO. 9833 OF 2019 Hardeendayal S/o Revaji Jagtap .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.

924 WRIT PETITION NO. 9843 OF 2019 Devrao S/o Raoji Bhamre .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for Respondents-State.

CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 07th AUGUST, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

The grievance of the petitioners is that the proposals forwarded by the management to the Education Officer for sanction of full time librarian post is not decided. Subsequent reminder is also given. 2.

In case, the proposals forwarded by the institution is pending with the Education Officer for sanction of full time post of librarian, then Education Officer shall take decision upon it on its own merits, in accordance with law,

2 914-WP9833-19+.doc expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (04) months from today. Depending upon the decision taken, further decision be taken with regard to the salary of the petitioners.

3.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

( MANGESH S. PATIL ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.