Durgabai Suresh Patil v. Shashikant Rajaram Tayade And ANR

2024:BHC-AUG:5663 42-CA-13580-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13580 OF 2023 IN FAST/23762/2023 DURGABAI SURESH PATIL

VERSUS

SHASHIKANT RAJARAM TAYADE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Madhav M. Bhokarikar Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Ms. Savita Parmeshwar Kakade (Matkar) Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Anand Dale holding for Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE : 08-03-2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Respondents have opposed the application contending that the delay has not been properly explained. After having gone through the application for condonation of delay, the Court is satisfied that the application deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following order is passed;

ORDER

i) The application is allowed.

ii) Delay in preferring appeal is condoned.

iii) OfÏce to register the appeal.

iv) Issue notice to respondents.

v) Learned counsels waive service of notice for respondent No.1 and 2.

vi) Call R & P.

vii) List the appeal on 30.04.2024.

( S. G. MEHARE ) JUDGE rrd Signed by: Rajesh Rameshrao Davane Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 14/03/2024 20:24:14