Gajanan Prasarak Mandal Partur Through Its Secretary Uday Kishanrao Neb v. The State Of Maharashtra Thorugh Its Secretary And Others
950.WP-9782-2023 & Ors.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 WRIT PETITION NO. 9782 OF 2023 SAKIB BAHU UDDESHIYA SEVABHAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT NISAR BASHIR SHAIKH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 953 WRIT PETITION NO. 9793 OF 2023 CHHATRAPATI SHAHU MAHARAJ BAHUUDDESHIYA SEVA SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BABASAHEB BABURAO INGALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 956 WRIT PETITION NO. 9800 OF 2023 LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI SANSKRUTIK YUVA KRIDA MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MANISH RAJENDRA SHRIVASTAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND 957 WRIT PETITION NO.9818 OF 2023 GAJANAN PRASARAK MANDAL PARTUR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY UDAY KISHANRAO NEB
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THORUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS AND Najeeb...
950.WP-9782-2023 & Ors.doc 963 WRIT PETITION NO.9829 OF 2023 JAY BHADRA BAHU UDDESHIYA SAMAJIK SANSTHA THROUGH ITSPRESIDENT YOGESH PRABHATRAO AMBHORE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...
Advocates for Petitioner in all petitions : Mr. A.N. Nagargoje h/f Mr. Mane Dhairyashil Machindra Addl.GP for Respondents in WP-9782-2023 : Mr. P.S. Patil AGP for Respondents in WP-9793-2023 : Mr. S. G. Sangale AGP for Respondents in WP-9800-2023 : Mr. S. K. Tambe AGP for Respondents in WP-9818-2023 & WP-9829-2023 : Mr. A.S. Shinde ...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 10 AUGUST 2023.
PER COURT :
Heard.
1.
The petitioners in all these petitions intend to start a new college. A favourable recommendation contemplated under Section 109 of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 has been forwarded by the University to the Government. It has communicated to the petitioners by the University on 06.06.2022 (Exhibit-C). The matters are pending with the respondent no.1.
2.
We dispose of the writ petitions by directing the respondent no.1 to take appropriate decision pursuant to the petitioners' proposals as expeditiously as possible and in any case within six weeks. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb...