← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/511/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Prabhakar Bhagwanrao Deshpande v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2017-04-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala2 pages

1 20-CP-511-15 and ors

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.511 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11130 OF 2014 Prabhakar s/o. Bhagwanrao Deshpande ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

..Respondents ­­ Mr.K.M.Nagarkar, Advocate for petitioner Mr.V.S.Badakh, AGP for respondent no.1 Mr.Manish Navandar, Advocate for respondent nos.2 and 4 ­­ CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 13, 2017 PER COURT :

Heard Mr.Nagarkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Navandar, learned Counsel for respondent nos.2 and 4.

2.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court had directed the respondents to return the amount recovered and if

2 20-CP-511-15 and ors fresh order is to be passed, the same has to be after hearing.

3.

There was a dispute with regard to the quantum of the amount to be recovered, however, it is stated on affidavit, that an amount of Rs.98,000/­ and odd, was recovered from the petitioner which has been refunded to the petitioner and subsequently, after hearing the petitioner, the order is passed.

4.

In view of that nothing survives in the Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

5.

In case subsequent order is passed against the petitioner, it is open for the petitioner to assail the same as may be permissible under the law.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] kbp