Nijam S/O Chindhu Tadvi v. The State Of Maharashtra

{1} 14 sr.no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 14 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4538 OF 2016 IN APEAL/472/2016 WITH APEAL/472/2016 NIJAM S/O CHINDHU TADVI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. R. S. Shinde h/f Mr. Ajay G. Talhar APP for Respondents: Mr. Jagatkar . . .

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATE : 1ST DECEMBER, 2016.

PER COURT:

We have carefully perused the notes of evidence. It appears that the applicant/appellant has killed his wife. There is sufficient evidence brought on record by the prosecution. The findings recorded by the trial court prima facie appears to be in consonance with the evidence brought on record. Hence, no case is made out for granting bail. Hence, the application for bail stands rejected.

2] Registry to send back the Record and Proceedings to the Sessions Court at Jalgaon. Upon receiving the record, the Registry of the concerned Court to prepare the paper book and send it back to this Court alongwith the Record and Proceedings, as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of 3 months from date of receipt of said record. Upon receiving the paper book and record by the Registry of this Court, Counsel for appellant would be at liberty to mention for early hearing of the appeal. [K.K.SONAWANE] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-