Dilip Baliram Chalwad v. Govind Madhavrao Gaikwad And Another

(1) 939 Appln-3451.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3451 OF 2024 IN ALPST/9468/2024 DILIP BALIRAM CHALWAD

VERSUS

GOVIND MADHAVRAO GAIKWAD AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. T.M. Venjane, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.J. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No. 2.

...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

12 FEBRUARY 2025.

ORDER:- 1.

The report of concerned Police Constable dated 07.02.2025 indicates that the respondent refused to accept the service and therefore, the concerned Police Constable sent text message on his mobile phone. As such, respondent No.1 is treated as served.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. Respondent No.1, despite service, remained absent.

3.

The application is for condonation of delay of 125 days in filing application for leave to appeal. There is no oppose to the application and hence it stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of.

4.

ALP be registered accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) VD_Dhirde